[ad_1]
The horrors of a disastrous Thursday at the Adelaide Oval will indeed ruin the wonderful memories of the place. Besides some great achievements in the past, the Indian team will now also remember the oval for teaching them something unique about the shortest form of cricket on a very forgotten evening.
Read also: England’s dominance highlights India’s T20 glitch Globalism cup campaign
The T20 is unlike any other cricket that is traditionally played via any other format and, therefore, cannot be seen from any of these lenses at any time. The format must be seen, to a large extent already, and to the extent possible in the future, as an entirely different by-product of the game in order to understand and excel.
There will be a lot of things for the Indian team to consider as they sit down for the post-mortem examination of Thursday’s match, and there are a lot of points already clear – a) traveling with an opening pair that didn’t go right, b) inconsistency with their choices for the wicket-keeper- keeper-bat, c) not letting the best player of the traveling group have a chance, d) not looking beyond a group of ‘middle keeper’ and making some braver choices.
T20 World Cup 2022: full coverage | a program | consequences | points table | Gallery
There will probably be more things to point out and that will happen as well. But once all this settles down, what is the team India Optimizers should also bear in mind that they have been getting some things completely wrong about this format for some time now. Unlike test cricket, where there is another session to recover if the first goes wrong; Unlike the 50+ year old cricket which allows more breathing space; T20 doesn’t really allow much of a chance to get back into the game if the initiative is lost.
It is the only internationally accepted formula at the moment where “interactive actions” do not apply. For the team to be responsible, it must be “proactive” and make a narrative with each ball rather than following it.
This is only possible when a) a model is given preference over reputation at all times, b) a strict “horses for courses” policy is applied and selection processes remain entirely driven by numbers, c) fear of potential loss does not come in the way of brave choice, d) is made Bringing in serious data-crunching tools for team management/selection rather than leaving the group in the hands of retired players who have never dealt with coordination.
The scarcity lies in clarity of thought. The kind of clarity that was visible in 2007 under the former India Test great Dilip Vengsarkar when the call was received that all the great cricketers of the time would take a back seat and allow a very small team – with a decent mix of experience – to travel to South Africa.
At that time, the “big players” were also involved in this decision.
Fifteen years have passed since then and all Indian cricket needs today is to revisit 2007 and start over.
Get the latest cricket newsAnd the a program And the live cricket scores over here
[ad_2]
Source link
