[ad_1]
India’s much talked about campaign in the ICC Men’s T20 Championship Globalism The 2022 Cup ended with a semi-final defeat to England. Their preparation for the final event was severely affected when Jaspreet Bumrah and Ravindra Jadega were left out due to injuries, with little even ruling out India’s chances of winning the title altogether. Amazing victory in the opening match India Solidly in the championship segment favorites though.
T20 World Cup 2022: full coverage | a program | consequences | points table | Gallery
The weaknesses overshadowed by the individual wit of Virat Kohli, Suryakumar Yadav, Hardik Pandya and Ardeep Singh came to haunt India in the semi-final match leading to a crushing defeat. The review will follow and it is very likely that we have seen the last of the big players in India, at least in the T20I format.
Before that, it’s time to assess the performance of the 15-player team individually. Of these, Harshal Patel and Yosvendra Chahal were the only two players who didn’t get a single game, and so it’s beyond the scope of this piece.
Kuala Lumpur Rahul – 2/10
The opening match scored half a century but both came against relatively weaker opponents – the Netherlands and Zimbabwe. Overall, it scored 128 points at 21.33 with a strike rate lower than the 120.75 level. This is clearly not something you want from a niche editorial in an era when top-tier hitters are expected to set the tone from the first ball itself and never take their foot off the gas.
Rohit Sharma – 3/10
Captain India had a miserable tournament as well. In six innings, he mustered 116 of them, 53 coming in against the Netherlands alone. At his peak, Rohit would gently settle down and then go berserk. In Australia, he was a pale shadow of his old self. Why did he get a plus mark for Rahul? Well, at least he showed intent to be aggressive more often than not.
Virat Kohli – 8/10
The most reliable Indian hitter throughout the tournament was Kohli. He may have hit #3 but in every match, he has found himself in the middle inside Powerplay. He’s not someone who will hit fours and sixes right from the start, but he knows how to juggle the field, turning the ones into twos and twos into threes. An excellent player prevents this terrible slip against South Africa which leads to a catch. He would, in all likelihood, finish as the top player of the tournament with a 296-round six-stroke of 98.66 and an average strike rate of 136.40.
Suryakumar Yadav – 8.5/10
By far, the best mixture in India. Fight Suryakumar the way modern T20I fighters are expected to do. It didn’t take much time to settle down and started finding boundaries easily. He finished second as India’s best player with 239 from six runs at 59.75 and an astonishing strike rate of 189.68. Show everyone by releasing a series of amazing and funky shots. Against South Africa when the entire batting lineup collapsed, SKY stood with fifty exploding.
Hardik Pandya – 7/10
Pandya, the allrounder, is back to his best. It’s been at this level for a few months now. He has given a string of great shows in Australia as well. Facing Pakistan, his three-lethal explosion was vital in stopping a belated troop surge. Against England, his quick fifty-five rate of fire was the reason India managed to put up a respectable total. From five rounds, he scored 128 points and at an average speed, he took 8 wickets – second more than India.
Dinesh Karthik – 1/10
It is safe to assume that Karthik’s T20I career ended with the T20 World Cup. It was one of the happiest stories in the lead up to the tournament as Karthik made a strong case for including him in the T20I setup as the ultimate captain. He could keep the share it was a bonus. The particular finisher couldn’t offer a late-running injection. In 3 runs, Karthik managed 14 rounds with a strike rate of 63.63. Plus, his glove work wasn’t up to the mark either.
Ravichandran Ashwin – 5/10
Ashwin was favored over Chahal and made a decent show. The driver tool did not leak and was often tidy. He took six wickets at 25.83, had a strike rate of 19 and an economy of 8.15. While sealing the leakage is desirable, it has become quite apparent that teams are able to compensate for the slow in the middle by using hammer and tongs in the event of death if they have a stake in the bank. India’s inability to take a cut in the middle has been a weakness.
Mohammed Al Shami – 5/10
Al-Shami was not part of the original 15-man squad, and Al-Shami was taking advantage of Boumera’s injury. While his exclusion was widely criticized, no one expected Shami to take on the role of Bumrah in T. Although he didn’t burn the stage, Shami didn’t disappoint either. He took 6 wickets from 6 matches in 23.83, had a strike rate of 20 and was economic – 7.15. Once again, the missing link: the ability to take a stake. Take a share, and hit the difference. It didn’t happen much.
Arshdeep Singh – 7/10
The left arm accelerator continued to climb. He was impressive and will surely serve India for a long time if he continues to advance at this rate. Against Pakistan, Arshdeep was thrilled with the new ball and finished with 10 wickets from six matches – more than India. It averaged 15.60, the strike rate was 12, and the economy was 7.8.
Bovneshwar Kumar – 4/10
Fairly economical but the wicket was missing – only four out of six. Being one of the big bowlers on the side, he was expected to be a role model. Bhuvneshwar’s strength lies in getting the new ball moving and making early breakthroughs for India. Take twice with the new ball. He went three times flawlessly and that too against the likes of South Africa, Bangladesh and England.
Aksar Batel – 3/10
Another beneficiary of an injured player. Axar has appeared in all but one of the matches in the World Cup and that is only because Jadeja missed the tournament. Axar brings with him a similar skill set but is not as polished and influential as his first teammate. He has three wickets at 38.33, a strike rate of 26.6 and an economy of 8.62 – the highest among Indian bowlers. With the bat, he managed 9 out of three runs. In his defense, the allrounder wasn’t fully used as Karami although his tendency to leak runs was probably the biggest reason behind this trend. Looks like he was only on eleven as a safety net – to add depth to the batting lineup.
Rishiba Pant – 2/10
Harsh to judge a wicket owner who only played two matches and his main contribution was serving drinks during breaks as Karthik continued to do so. Pant’s first taste of the World Cup came during the South Africa game when Karthik walked off the field clutching his back and the youngster replaced him behind his stumps. Then Pant got a full match in the unimportant Super 12 final against Zimbabwe as India gave him another chance in the semi-finals as well.
Against Zimbabwe, he entered fifth in thirteenth place but held five deliveries and added 3 runs. In the semifinals, he walked through the eighteenth, opened his account with a limit but then ran out in 6.
Deepak Hoda – 1/10
Hooda was often seen on the field but only as a substitute when the exhausted India international needed a fracture. His solo chance against South Africa came as India hoped to bolster its combat system against a fearsome quick attack from Kagisu Rabada, Enrique Norte, Lungi Ngidi and Wayne Parnell. did not work. He’s had a total of three deliveries – two of them from Nortje and Hooda are like a lost soul trying to find a way to get part of his racquet on the ball but fail miserably to get out of 0.
Get the latest cricket newsAnd the a program And the Live cricket scores over here
[ad_2]
Source link
