“We do anything but football” – Supreme Court recognizes the status of football in India


The Supreme Court said on Wednesday that the “grassroots” sport of soccer needed to move forward and asked people to submit amicus curiae motions for the National Sports Association’s draft constitution, noting that “we do anything but football”.

The bench consisting of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justices Hima Kohli and JB Pardiwala has been notified that objections to the draft Constitution of All India The AIFF was well received.

Read also | FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022: Luka Modric heads up the Croatia campaign for Zlatko Dalic

“Amicus curiae (chief advocate Gopal Sankarnayanan assisting the court) is required to schedule objections so that the constitution can be finalised,” it said in an order.

The arbitral tribunal said that the AIFF forensic audit report had been received and distributed to the judges.

It also took note of the memoirs of senior advocate Raju Ramchandran, who appeared before the Football Association, that since a contempt petition was filed against eight persons, including four current managing members of the sports body, it would be appropriate to assign the petition to the Football Association. friend of the court to follow it.

The council then issued a notice of contempt and upheld it for a hearing two weeks later.

She said that “any party wishing to submit proposals for the draft constitution can do so and give it to an amicus curiae.”

Initially, the bench lamented the status of football in the country, saying “we do anything but football”.

“Unlike hockey and cricket which are really, in a sense, national sports, football is a popular sport that we all played. But you know it hasn’t reached that level or standard,” said Chief Justice Chandrachod.

“So, we all have to move on. Now, please start the process of finalizing the FIFA constitution… so that the responsible people in this sport can come in,” he said.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who is representing the centre, said it was because the Under-17 Women’s Court intervened. Globalism The 2022 cup could be hosted by India.

He also said that the FFA constitution now needed to be finalized and “Secondly, my lords need to direct forensic audits.”

Mehta said the criminal audit report is with an amicus curiae and will be given to the affected persons and thirdly, there is the contempt petition to be heard.

The amicus curiae said the company that did AIFF’s forensic review had put out some warnings that some of the content was of a personal nature and the court could take a call about her post after seeing it.

“I am reticent about not sharing something,” said Chief Justice Chandrachod, adding that this aspect will be discussed later.

Earlier, the Supreme Court ordered the termination of the mandate of a three-member committee of administrators it appointed in May to run the affairs of the National Football League.

Also read: Why James Hillier is betting on track and field to bring India medals from athletics

The Supreme Court said it was amending its previous orders to facilitate the annulment of the suspension imposed by FIFA on FIFA and the hosting of the 2022 FIFA U-17 World Cup in India.

On May 18, the committee chaired by Justice (Ret.) Anil R Dev, former Election Commissioner C Qureshi and former Indian football team captain Bhaskar Ganguly, ousted NCP leader Praful Patel to the management committee which had over two and a half years over its term. .

The order came on the basis of a new appeal submitted by the Ministry of Youth Affairs and sports Seeking to amend the court orders issued on May 18 and August 3 after consulting with FIFA to ensure the revocation of the suspension of the Asian Football Confederation and the right to host the Women’s World Cup in India.

Appearing to the Centre, Solicitor General Mehta said there were “two catastrophic outcomes” the country would face, if the orders were not amended – one, India would lose the rights to host any future FIFA World Cups, and the other, Indian teams would not be able to play even international matches. friendly all over the world.

He said it was not a matter of discriminating against India but that FIFA had a unified policy against third party interference.

On August 17, the Supreme Court asked the center to take a “proactive” role in lifting the FIFA’s suspension from FIFA and facilitating the holding of the U-17 Women’s World Cup in India.

On 16 August, FIFA suspended India due to “undue influence from third parties” and said that the tournament “could not currently be held in India as planned”. The country hosted its first ever FIFA event from October 11-30.

Read all files The latest sports news over here


Source link

Leave a Comment