[ad_1]
Who is a billionaire today? Elon Musk Sink into Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters after the acquisition of the microblogging giant, his and the company’s moves remain in the spotlight.
Mask has turned his Twitter handle into a kind of bulletin board, where statements are made in tweets. From Flying Free to $8 Everyone, Musk makes some big announcements after seizing power.
But the new owner of Twitter, who calls himself the “absolute of free speech”, has confused many users with his contradictory actions that made headlines.
not funny
American comedian Kathy Griffin’s Twitter account comment has gained immense traction on the platform. It is believed that her account was suspended for impersonating Musk.
She tweeted about the US midterm elections under the name Musk. While responding to a screenshot of Griffin’s suspended account, Musk wrote on the platform that it had been removed for “impersonating a comic”.
After taking the reins of the company, the same Musk tweeted: “Comedy is now legal on Twitter.” Popular Twitter accounts joking or impersonating Musk have appeared across the platform since then.
In a Twitter message, he said, “Previously, we issued a warning before suspending, but now that we’re starting to implement verification more widely, there will be no warning. This will be clearly defined as a requirement to sign up for Twitter Blue.”
“Any name change whatsoever will result in a temporary loss of the verified check mark,” he added.
This appears to be a contradictory update from a man who tweeted about the “comedy” just a few days ago. That would suggest that comedy is acceptable on the platform, as long as it doesn’t break any “rules” that can likely be changed at the drop of the hat and subject to the whims of musk.
Similar to Griffin, American comedian Sarah Silverman changed her Twitter name and profile picture to match Musk’s, drawing attention to the problem of a verification system that doesn’t actually verify account ownership.
Silverman tweeted: “I’m chasing freedom of speech and eat breakfast every day.” However, after changing her account back to her name and photo, she tweeted a screenshot indicating that it had been locked.
Musk has stated that his goal for Twitter is to become “by far the most accurate source of information around the world,” so cracking down on impostor accounts is part of that mission. In addition, the new owner also reinforced his commitment to “freedom of speech” saying, “My commitment to freedom of expression extends even to not banning the account that follows my aircraft, even though this presents an immediate risk to personal safety.”
No pardon for the parodies
Here, it should be highlighted what Musk mentioned on the platform regarding the parodies. He wrote: “From now on, any Twitter trades that engage in impersonation without being identified as ‘parody’ will be permanently suspended.”
The YouTube channel and podcast account with 2.3 million followers on Twitter, h3h3Productions, was suspended this week after changing its display name to “Elon Musk” and using an old Musk photo. Mocking Musk, the account tweeted: “Although Jeffrey Epstein committed horrific crimes, I still miss him on nights like these because of his warmth and friendship. Rest in peace, my old friend.”
The tweet garnered more than 12,000 likes and nearly 2,000 retweets. But later the account was banned. According to reports, the comment was held even after the account changed its bio to clearly state that it was a parody account and a banner captioned an image saying “a parody account”.
This incident also appears to contradict Musk’s satirical accounts.
Twitter policy or musk?
However, it should be noted that Twitter’s current policies already include a section dedicated to “parody accounts, comments, and fans”. It states: “Under this policy, a parody, comment, or fan account is an account that depicts a person, group, or other organization on their profile discussing, parodying, or sharing information about that entity.”
The policy also states that while these accounts may use elements of someone else’s identity, they also include profile language that indicates that the account is not associated with the profile’s subject matter. “Accounts that post news updates about a particular entity, known as news accounts and role-playing accounts may also fall under this classification,” it added.
Additionally, it states that accounts can indicate that they are not related to the subject depicted in the profile” by incorporating words such as, but not limited to, ‘parody’, ‘fake’, ‘like’ or ‘comment’. This language must be stated in such a way that the intended audience can understand it.”
In the event of suspension, Twitter’s private policy highlights three levels and the company suspends accounts after following the first two levels.
the first is Edit profilewhich states: “When we receive a valid report, we may provide an opportunity to make your account compliant. If we determine that you have not adequately distinguished your account name and resume, we may ask you to edit the content on your profile.”
The second level is temporary suspension. In this case, the policy states: “If you fail to make profile modifications within the time frame specified in our request, we may temporarily suspend your account. In some cases, we may temporarily suspend your account prior to requesting modifications.”
Then another one comes, permanent commentwhich clearly states that if a Twitter user makes “insufficient modifications” to the profile “after your first warning, we may permanently suspend your account.”
So, as it now appears, the last suspension of accounts has occurred by skipping the first two levels. This sparked widespread debate over content management decisions, as well as whether there was a policy change that people weren’t aware of or if it was all about the new director making the final call.
Read all files Latest technology news over here
[ad_2]
Source link